vt .4 A IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 7326 OF 2025 • ' ■ I Between: Gangupalli Santhamma, W/o. Gangupalli Markonda Reddy, Aged about 64 years, R/o D.No.1-12, J Kotthuru Villlage, Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of AP, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. . 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palamaner Mandal, Chittoor District. 4. The Tahsildar, Bangarupalem Mandal Chittoor District. 5. S. Sri Ramulu, S/o. Late Munirathnam, R/o. J Kotthuru Villlage, Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District. S/o. Late Munirathnam, Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District. S/o. Late Munirathnam, Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District 6. S. Mohan R/o. J Kotthuru Villlage, 7. S. Tulasi, R/o. J Kotthuru Villlage, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, the declaring action of *r ■ the respondents in interfering with my peaceful possession and dominion hold occupancy over the lands in the lands in Sy. No.411-3, to an extent of 0.49 cent of J Kothuru Village, Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District threatening to dispossess the petitioner herein from the said lands and as illegal, of India consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner respect lands in the lands in Sy. No.411-3, to an extent of 0.49 cent of J Kothuru Village Mandal, Chittoor District peaceful possession and enjoyment over the their lands. arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution and violation of Principal of Natural Justice and Bangarupalem lA NO: 1 OF 2n?Fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the peaceful possession and enjoyment of lands in Sy. No.411-3 to an extent of 0.49 cent of J Kothuru Village, Bangarupalem pending disposal of the writ petition. Mandal, Chittoor District, Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P B REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7: The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010127612025 B5S IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3505] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 7326/2025 Between: Gangupalli Santhamma ...PETITIONER AND The State of AP and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P B REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 :# The Court made the foilowinq order: The petitioner claims that she was granted DKT patta vide DKT No.199/4/1414, dated 04.11.2004 in respect of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.49 cents in Survey No.411-3 of J.Kothuru Village, Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District. Subsequent to the grant of \ patta, she was issued pattadar passbook and title deed. It is her th further case that at the instance of respondents 5 to 7, the 4 respondent tried to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner without any notice and without following the due process of law. Aggrieved by the said action, the present writ petition is filed. 2. On perusal of the documents filed along with the writ petition, it is clear that the petitioner was assigned the subject land and she was given pattadar passbook and her name was also mutated in the revenue records. The only grievance of the petitioner that the 4‘^ respondent is 3. trying to interfere with her possession without issuing notice. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader would submit that, if any action to be initiated against the petitioner, they would do so after putting the petitioner on notice. Taking into consideration of the submission made by the learned 4. counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the ■V 3 subject land, except in accordance with law. There shall be no order •- • as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /r ^ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue Velagapudi, Guntur District. The District Collector, Chittoor, Chittoor District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palamaner Mandal, Chittoor District. The Tahsildar, Bangarupalem Mandal, Chittoor District. One CC to Sri P B Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies Secretariat, 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. TF ■■ HIGH COURT DATED:08/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.7326 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS