HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6416 of 2024 (Sl. No. 256) Court No. - 88 HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Subash Gosai, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A.-I for the State. 3. None appears on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 and 3. 4. The instant criminal revision has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 22.10.2024 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Court No. 2, Meerut, in Case No. 438 of 2019 (Smt. Mona And Another vs. Kuldeep Singh) under Section 125 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist is already paying a sum of Rs. 4,339/- per month as maintenance which is being deducted from his salary. The total salary of the revisionist is Rs. 76,019/- per month. It is undisputed that the opposite party no. 2 and 3 are the wife and daughter, respectively of the revisionist. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has no difficulty in paying the interim maintenance as awarded by the trial court; however he seeks adjustment of the amount of Rs. 4,339/- being deducted from his salary, which is being paid under the orders of his department. 4. From perusal of the impugned interim order dated 22.10.2024 it is Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Santosh Kumar Kesarwani, Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Yogendra Pal Singh Kuldeep Singh .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) noted that it has already been provided in the order that if the opposite parties are getting any maintenance from any other order of the Courts or any amount is being paid to her through the department of the revisionist, the same shall be adjusted against the interim maintenance awarded by the impugned order dated 22.10.2024. In view thereof, since the adjustment of the amount being paid as per the orders of the department of revisionist is provided in the impugned order, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant case, specifically when the impugned order is an interim order and all pleas and contentions are open to the raised by the revisionist before the trial court where the matter is still pending. 5. In view thereof, the instant revision is devoid of merit and is accordingly, dismissed. September 8, 2025 Kirti CRLR No. 6416 of 2024 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad