Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110361 (ALL)

IMAMUN NISHA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/42789/2024 · 2025-01-27

Siddhartha Varma, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13857-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42789 of 2024 Petitioner :- Imamun Nisha Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Firdos Ahmad,Mahesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Narendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Upon receipt of the Demand Notice dated 01.09.2024, the petitioner approached the Electricity Department stating that the notice was sent to the petitioner erroneously. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Electricity Department states that the objection moved by the petitioner would be treated as an objection/representation under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005 and shall be decided within a period of 10 days and for that period or till the date the representation/objection is decided, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the objection filed by the petitioner, would be treated to be a representation, under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005, and shall be decided within a period of 10 days from today. Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Arun K. Singh [Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.] [Siddhartha Varma, J.] Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad