APHC010127122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between: Nadigatla Siva Sankar The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. PINNINTI KEERTI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the BNSS, is filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/A connection with Crime No. Visakhapatnam Commissi punishable under Sections the BNS. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2727 OF 2025 Nadigatla Siva Sankar ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: PINNINTI KEERTI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the BNSS, is filed on behalf of the petitioner herein/A2 to grant anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.745 of 2024 of P.M.Palem Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 115(2) read with 3(5) of [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the BNSS, is filed to grant anticipatory bail in Police Station, read with 3(5) of 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 24.12.2024, at about 10.30pm, while the Hidden Spark Family Restaurant was being closed, A1 along with other accused came and asked to serve food. When the de facto complainant informed them that no food was left to serve, all the accused went into the kitchen of the restaurant and argued, and A1 along with others attacked the Chef and hit him on the head with a bear bottle, causing bleeding injuries. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that A1, A3 and A4 in the present crime were already enlarged on regular bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that by this time most of the investigation might have been completed and hence, prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material on record, it is alleged against the petitioner herein is that he has attacked the complainant party by using bear bottle. In the light of the above, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J 20.03.2025 TJN HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2727 OF 2025 Dated: 20.03.2025 TJN