RAKESH KULSHRESHTHA AND 2 OTHER v. State of U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/40734/2024 · 2025-03-17
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 110295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38915 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40734 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kulshreshtha And 2 Other Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vidya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kant Singh Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
1. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the opposite party to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the opposite party feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
2. The order dated 03.05.2024 passed by the respondent no.2, namely, Additional Commissioner- First Aligarh Division Aligarh is under challenge.
3. By the aforesaid order, the order dated 14.08.2023 passed by the respondent No.3/ Additional Collector (Administration) District Etah was set aside and the matter was remanded back to decide the matter as fresh after providing opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.
4. After some arguments, counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer to the extend that the respondent no.3 before whom the matter was remanded be directed to decide the same expeditiously.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3 and Sri K.K. Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4.
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without interfering
with the order dated 03.05.2024 passed by the respondent no.2, which is under challenge, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.3 before whom the matter was remanded by the respondent no.2 to decide the same strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy before the respondent no.3 but without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Radhika Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad