Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110293 (ALL)

MAHESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/11817/2024 · 2025-01-31

Deepak Verma

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14796 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11817 of 2024 Applicant :- Mahesh Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Subhas Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 399 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station- Kalyanpur, Commissionerate, Kanpur Nagar. 3. It is alleged in the first information report that one Mohammad Shadab Ahmad, student of B.C.A. transcript issued found forged and fabricated. On enquiry, it is found that transcript has been issued by the owner of mobile no. 7571926192. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Applicant is the owner of the said mobile number. Applicant is not named in the first information report. There is no evidence against the applicant to prosecute him in the present case. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is apprehensive of imminent arrest. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate with the investigation. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 5. Considered the submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire record. From perusal of record, it is apparent that applicant is the owner of alleged mobile number and he has issued forged documents. Further, proper interrogation is required in this matter as investigation is still going on and from the interrogation it would be revealed that how many persons are involved in the alleged offence. No case for interference by this Court is made out. 6. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands rejected. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Aditya Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad