Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3239 WP No. 201411 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
WRIT PETITION NO.201411 OF 2025 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN:
VEERABHADRAPPA S/O BASANNA CHINCHIRKI, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED CEO PACS, JALAHALLI, R/O H.NO.21, WARD NO.10 SHANTESHWARA NAGAR, NEAR VALMIKI CIRCLE, JALAHALLI, TQ. DEVADURGA, DIST. RAICHUR-584116.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SACHIN MADHUKAR MAHAJAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE CEO PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., JALAHALLI, TQ. DEVADURGA, DIST. RAICHUR-584116.
Digitally signed by SHIVALEELA DATTATRAYA UDAGI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3239 WP No. 201411 of 2025
3.
THE REGISTRAR, OF CO-OPERATIVES NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BANGALORE-560052.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R3;
SRI. RAVI B. PATIL ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15.05.2025, BEARING NO. ‘NIL’ ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-K.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN)
Lis pertains to dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.2 in respect of certain amounts allegedly due from the petitioner to respondent No.2. The petitioner submits that he is not liable to pay any amounts to respondent No.2. However, as the lis involves disputed question of facts, this Court cannot resolve the same in exercise of its power under
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3239 WP No. 201411 of 2025
Article 226 of Constitution of India. The petitioner is having alternative efficacious remedy.
2. For that reason, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in the manner known to law, the writ petition is hereby dismissed.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
SMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 113 CT:SI