CPSW No. 176/2012 in SWP No. 1616/2010 Page 1 of 2 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 176/2012 in SWP No. 1616/2010 Date of Pronouncement: 19.11.2025 Uploaded on : 24.11.2025 Bhupinder Singh …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate Q Vs Farooq Ahmed & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE ORDER (ORAL) 1. Upon coming of the instant contempt petition for consideration, the counsel for the petitioner would contend that the respondents did not consider the case of the petitioner in tune with the directions passed by this Court on 29.10.2011, on which date, the writ petition filed by the petitioner bearing SWP No. 1616/2010 came to be disposed of requiring the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation of his services with a further direction to the concerned authorities to make available the relevant record as also permitting the petitioner to produce the relevant material/record before the respondents. 2. However, the counsel for the respondents, while referring to the statement of facts filed on 29.10.2025, would submit that in the process of considering the case of the petitioner, certain clarifications/documents for determining the eligibility of the petitioner were deemed necessary by a Committee constituted for the purpose vide order dated 25.07.2025 and, accordingly, the petitioner came to be called upon to furnish the said relevant material/record S. No. 16 CPSW No. 176/2012 in Page 2 of 2 SWP No. 1616/2010 by or before 07.09.2025, however, the petitioner did not furnish the said relevant material/record, as a result whereof, the case of the petitioner could not be considered and settled. 3. Confronted with the aforesaid stand taken in the statement of facts filed by the respondents/contemnors, the counsel for the petitioner would seek two weeks’ time to furnish the necessary requisite documents/record before the respondents enabling the respondents/contemnors to comply with the order dated 29.10.2011. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid position obtaining in the matter, contempt notice issued is recalled and proceedings are closed with a liberty to the petitioner to institute contempt proceedings in the event after furnishing of the requisite documents/record to the respondents, the respondents fail to comply with the order dated 29.10.2011. (Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge Jammu 19.11.2025 Diksha