Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110281 (PNJ)

RAKHI SATIA v. HARYANA STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ANR

CWP/34789/2024 · 2025-01-23

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

106 IN THE HI Rakhi Satia Haryana Staff Sel CORAM: HON Present: Mr. TRIBHUVAN D The quashing the me petitioner’s candi (Theory), categor want of requisite mode. 2. Lear the Department qualification/B.Sc University on 05 regard he has r respondent which …t Instru in ac Com HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND AT CHANDIGARH CWP-34789-2024 Date of Decision Versus aff Selection Commission and Anr. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBH Mr. Rakshit Gupta, Advocate for the AN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter a memo/letter dated 25.10.2023, A candidature for the post of Craft Instr ategory no.82, against advertisement 1 quisite qualification/Diploma in B.Sc Learned counsel contends that the p ment as Instructor on contractual n/B.Sc degree in Fashion Design on 05.02.2008 was duly verified an has referred to letter, dated 22.11. which is to the following effect: the certificates of Mrs. Rakhi Seti Instructor (on contract basis) verified in accordance with the conditions o Committee on 18.03.2008. AND HARYANA 2024 (O&M) cision : 23.01.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents RIBHUVAN DAHIYA for the petitioner. ter alia seeking a writ of certiorari 3, Annexure P-15 whereby the ft Instructor (Women) Dress Making ment 12/2019, has been rejected for n B.Sc Fashion Design in regular t the petitioner has been working in al basis since 2011. And her esign awarded by the Annamalai ied and found to be valid. In this 22.11.2018, issued by the second hi Setia, Fashion Design Technology erified by Annamalai University are tions of draft rules prepared by the ari the king d for gular g in r ai this cond logy y are y the PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.28 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-34789-2024 He further conten Department, there memo, dated 25. 3. Hear 4. It is Craft Instructor aforementioned a qualifications for 5. The Statement of Mar Entry’ admitted distance educatio the post is full tim possess. Only be 2011 or that her cannot confer elig of the degree/ce mode. Whereas, regular mode. rejecting the petit 2024 -2- contends that once the certificates have t, there is no reason for it to reject th ed 25.10.2023. Heard. It is apparent on record that the peti ructor (women) Dress Making (T ned advertisement which clearly stip ns for the post. i) Full time, regular m Apparel/Dress Design /Garm institute/University recognize Fashion Technology (NIFT)/A Education/State Board of Tec Government with one year pra The petitioner’s degree of B.Sc arks, Annexures P-3 and P-4, est itted to the degree course conducte ucation mode. Undisputedly, the esse ime/regular mode Bachelor degree because she had been working as at her certificates were got verified fer eligibility on her. Besides, the veri ree/certificates which were obtained reas, to gain eligibility a candidate h Therefore, no exception can be e petitioner’s candidature. ve been found to be valid by the ject the candidature vide impugned he petitioner applied for the post of (Theory) in response to the ly stipulated the following essential ular mode Bachelor Degree in /Garment Manufacturing from any ognized by National Institute of IFT)/All India Council of Technical of Technical Education of any State ear practical/teaching experience. B.Sc Fashion Design as well as , establish that she was a ‘Lateral nducted by the University through e essential qualification required for egree which the petitioner does not ing as a contractual Instructor since erified from the University earlier, e verification only certified validity btained through distance education idate has to possess the degree in a an be taken to the impugned memo y the gned st of the ntial in any e of nical State ll as teral ough for s not since rlier, lidity ation in a emo PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.28 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-34789-2024 6. In vi 7. Dism January 23, 2025 ps 2024 -3- In view thereof, there is no ground to Dismissed. , 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable und to entertain the petition. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No YA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.28 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document