2025:UHC:8010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1020 OF 2025 1.Abbas 2.Subahan ..... Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate with Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Brief Holder. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. This is an Application for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.434 of 2025, registered at Kotwali Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007. 2. As per the First Information Report, the police party received a secret information on 05.09.2025 that Gulsher is slaughtering cows in front of his house. The police party raided the spot. They noticed that several persons were present in an open plot. One co-accused Ishtekhar was arrested. The 1 2025:UHC:8010 police party recovered 950 Kg. beef and other articles from the spot. Arrested person Ishtekhar told the police that Subahan Ali and Abbas Ali (applicants) were also involved in slaughtering the cows who fled from the spot. 3. Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent. 4. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate contended that the applicants were not present on the spot. They have been falsely implicated by the arrested co-accused. They are not convicted persons. They are permanent residents of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of their absconding. 5. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally. 6. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 7. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts 2 2025:UHC:8010 and circumstances of the case, the present application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed. It is directed that in the event of the arrest of the applicants Abbas and Subahan, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/ - and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions: - (i) Applicants shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicants shall attend the trial court regularly and they shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (iii) Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case; (iv) Applicants shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court. 8. It is clarified that if the applicants misuse or violate any of the conditions, imposed upon them, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date :10.09.2025 JKJ/Pant 3