Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11026 (AP)

Sattu Santhi Kiran v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/5553/2019 · 2025-08-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010126492019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5553/2019 Between: 1. SATTU SANTHI KIRAN, S/O.NAGA LINGAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.ALLPURAM VILLAGE, GANNAGARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR I O ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. UDAYA BHASKARA RAO(SC FOR ACB SPL PP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5553 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in completing the investigation to file charge sheet as directed by the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada vide official memorandum dated 22.03.2017 as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of provisions of CR.P.C. and consequently direct the respondents to comply the orders of Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada forthwith and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the writ petitioner is no more, and cause of action also does not survive. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22.08.2025 Pmk 4 23 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5553 OF 2019 Date: 22.08.2025 Pmk