AT CHANDIGARH CWP-235-2025 Date of Decision:-12.05.2025 SUVIKARAM JYOTI AND OTHERS … Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present:- Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, Punjab. **** SUDHIR SINGH J .(Oral) 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners have sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the official respondent No.2 to release the amount of enhanced compensation to the tune of `2,33,23,969/- on parity basis with judgment of this Court in CWP-3980-2013 titled as Prem Kumar vs. Tribunal Improvement Trust, Jalandhar & Others, which was further uphled by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos.9815-9818 of 2017. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already made representations dated 11.08.2021, 05.10.2021 and 03.07.2023 (Annexures P-8 to P-10, respectively) to the competent authority for redressal of their grievances, but no action has been taken thereon till GAURAV SOROT 2025.05.16 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-235-2025 -:2:- date. He further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with the concerns/grievances and pass an appropriate order on the said representations. 3. Served with an advance copy of the petition, Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, Punjab appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the said representations shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 (competent authority), to look into the pending representations dated 11.08.2021, 05.10.2021 and 03.07.2023 (Annexures P-8 to P-10, respectively) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH ) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) 12.05.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.05.16 10:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document