M/S VISHWANATH TADKALE CONTRACTOR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
WP/203195/2022 · 2025-03-11
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11024 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11024 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1589 WP No. 203195 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 203195 OF 2022 (T-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S VISHWANATH TADKALE CONTRACTOR SRI VISHWANATH S/O ANNA RAO TADKALE, R/O. VILLAGE NIDODA, AURAD-B, TQ. AURAD-B, DIST. BIDAR. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SANDEEP VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI – 100 001.
2.
THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERS CENTRAL TAX (CGST) AND CENTRAL EXCISE, GULBARGA DIVISION, BEHIND TV STATION, REVANSIDESHWAR COLONY, KALABURAGI 585 104.
3.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, LVO-540, KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICE TAXES OFFICE, BIDAR – 585 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SUDHIRSINGH R. VIJAPUR, D.S.G.I., FOR R1;
SRI SHIVARAJ S. BOLLOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, A.G.A. FOR R3)
Digitally signed by BASALINGAPPA SHIVARAJ DHUTTARGAON Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-K:1589 WP No. 203195 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF NOTICE/DATED 12.07.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 HEREIN IN FILE ACCT-LGSTO-540/BDR/ASMT-10/22-23/ DATED 12.07.2022, THE COPY OF WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 HEREIN TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.07.2022, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN, FORTHWITH, THE COPY OF WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
A memo is filed seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is accepted with all just exceptions, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. It is stated that the petitioner intends to avail the benefits under amended Sub Section 5 of Section 16 of CGST Act. The petitioner is entitled to the benefit under the aforementioned provision, if provision has conferred any such benefit. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
THM/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0