1 2025:CGHC:13886 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 860 of 2020 • Smt. Sona Bai Jaiswal W/o Shri Balram Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 77 Years R/o Village Beltara, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Collector, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Through Superintending Engineer, Tifra, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company, Seepat, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. Junior Engineer, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company, Beltara, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2/State For Respondents No. 3 to 5 : : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Additional Advocate General Mr. Varun Shama, Advocatge Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22/03/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s): “10.1]That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders and the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to relocate the installation/erection of electric poles from the land of the Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 petitioner situated at Kh. No. 581/1 admeasuring 0.141 Hect, RNM Ratanpur, Tahsil Kota, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) in the interest of justice. 10.2] Alternatively, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders and the respondent authorities may kindly be directed to pay adequate compensation for installation of the electric poles, in the interest of justice. 10.3] That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. At the very outset, Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti