Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11022 (KAR)

SHAKUNTALA v. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL AND ORS

WP/202265/2024 · 2025-06-18

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3256 WP No. 202265 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 202265 OF 2024 (S-R) BETWEEN: SMT. SHAKUNTALA W/O LATE BASAVANTRAYA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS OCCUPATION HOUSEHOLD RESIDENCE OF C/O MANIKREDDY PATIL BETAGERA, ANAND NILAYA CINEMA ROAD, SEDAM DISTRICT KALABURAGI-585222. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA OPP. TO VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAW JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT GENERAL (A & E) DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI ROAD VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. 4. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE KALBURAGI DISTRICT COURT KALABURAGI-585102. Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3256 WP No. 202265 of 2024 5. THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHINCHOLI CHINCHOLI, KALABURAGI DISTRICT -585307. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M A SUBRAMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R4: SMT. MAYA P R HCGP FOR R2 & R3: SRI B PRAMOD, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER HER REPRESENTATION DATED 30.05.2024 AT ANNEXURE-M, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND GRANT HER FAMILY PENSION AND OTHER BENEFITS RETROSPECTIVELY FROM THE DATE OF HER ADMISSIBILITY ALONG WITH INTEREST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider her representation dated 30.05.2024 at Annexure-M in accordance with law and grant her family pension and other benefits retrospectively from the date of her admissibility along with interest in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. The case of the petitioner is that her husband Basavantaraya, while working as Second Division Assistant - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3256 WP No. 202265 of 2024 in the office of the fifth respondent, died on 14.12.2003. In the service records of the husband of the petitioner, the names of the petitioner as well as the children were shown as the nominees for the family pension vide Annexure-B dated 27.06.2003. The third respondent, vide Annexure- C, dated 04.10.2013, paid the DCRG of Rs.1,24,800/- in favour of the daughter and family pension has been sanctioned at Rs.2,430/- in favour of the daughter. In the meantime, the petitioner and her daughter, both, filed P & S.C. before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sedam in P & SC No.01/2017. By order dated 24.04.2018, the Succession Certificate has been granted to the petitioner and her daughter. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted a representation vide Annexure-M dated 30.05.2024 to the respondent No.3, seeking grant of family pension in favour of the petitioner stating that the family pension paid to her daughter from 15.12.2003 to 25.01.2010. Afterwards, they are not paying any family pension neither to the petitioner nor to her daughter. So far, no action has been - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3256 WP No. 202265 of 2024 taken pursuant to Annexure-M. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. The learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.3 submits that, if this Court grants some reasonable time, the representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-M dated 30.05.2024 would be considered in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-M dated 30.05.2024, as expeditiously as possible, not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE Cm/- LIST NO.: 19 SL NO.: 2