1 2025:CGHC:6385 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2559 of 2018 Kapil Nath Kesharwani S/o Shri Dashrath Prasad Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) At Government Primary School Kot, Bilaigarh, R/o Village Sarsiwa, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 4. Block Education Officer, Bilaigarh District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate For State/ Respondents No. 1 and 4 : Mr. Lav Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 04/02/2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to prefer a Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.02.05 10:59:06 +0530 2 representation before respondent authorities in light of the judgment rendered by Hon’ble Division bench of this Court in the matter of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023. He contends that Assistant Teachers have been extended benefit of Krammonati Vetanman by that order. 2) On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes. 3) Heard. 4) Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Kashyap, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to prefer representation before respondent authorities in light of judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Smt. Sona Sahu (supra). If such representation is moved, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 5) With the aforesaid observation(s) & direction(s), instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya