1 2025:CGHC:17204 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1762 of 2025 Sariharo Singh Wd/o Kailash Singh Aged About 50 Years R/o Vill. Patel Para, (Navapara) Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) (Age Of The Applicant Wrongly Mention In Annexure A-1) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Incharge P.S. - Gandhi Nagar Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent For applicant : Shri Anuj Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Smt. Subha Shrivastava, PL. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 15/04/2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 101/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar Ambikapur Distt.- GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2025.04.21 11:12:31 +0530 2 Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Excise Act. 3. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on the basis of information received from informant police of Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Ambikapur on 9/02/2025 seized 08 bulk liter country made liquor from illegal possession of applicant and has arrested her. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and 08 bulk liter country made liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. He also submits that there are four cases against the applicant out of which one criminal case is pending, the applicant is in jail since 09/02/2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 5. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application. She further submits that 08 bulk liter country made liquor was recovered from the possession of the applicant. She would further submit that the applicant has four criminal antecedents under the Excise Act out of which one case is pending and remaining three cases are of the year 2006, 2010 and 2018. 6. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has four criminal antecedents under the Excise Act out of which one case is pending and remaining three cases are of the year 3 2006, 2010 and 2018 which are old and stale, applicant being a lady is in jail since 09/02/2025 and further the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 8. Let the applicant - Sariharo Singh, involved in Crime No. 101/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar Ambikapur Distt.-Surguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Excise Act, be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through her counsel. In case of her absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against her under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall 4 initiate proceedings against her in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her in accordance with law. 9. OfÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri