IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 572 Malkeet Dass and others State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 24.03.2003, their regularization of services in terms of the govt. 23.01.2001 and for grant of salary in the minimum of regular scale alongwith D.A., has been rejected. 2. admitted in para 7 of written statement filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 6, dated 04.08.2003, who were similarly circumstanced, have been granted regularization from the year 2001, in terms of the policy dated 23.01.2001, Annexure P granted the same others vs. Jagjit Singh and others IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Malkeet Dass and others Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. R.K.Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for dated 24.03.2003, Annexure P-4, whereby claim of the petitioners for their regularization of services in terms of the govt. 23.01.2001 and for grant of salary in the minimum of regular scale alongwith D.A., has been rejected. Learned counsel submits that admitted in para 7 of written statement filed on behalf of respondents to 6, dated 04.08.2003, who were similarly circumstanced, have been granted regularization from the year 2001, in terms of the policy dated 23.01.2001, Annexure P-2, however, the petitioners have been the same w.e.f. 2011. Reliance is placed on others vs. Jagjit Singh and others, 2016 (4) SCT 641. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10066-2003 (O & M) Date of decision: 26.03.2025 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY un Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order 4, whereby claim of the petitioners for their regularization of services in terms of the govt. instructions dated 23.01.2001 and for grant of salary in the minimum of regular scale Learned counsel submits that two persons, as has been admitted in para 7 of written statement filed on behalf of respondents to 6, dated 04.08.2003, who were similarly circumstanced, have been granted regularization from the year 2001, in terms of the policy , however, the petitioners have been Reliance is placed on State of Punjab and 2016 (4) SCT 641. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.27 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-10066-2003 -2- 3. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents shall re-examine the matter, taking note of the afore submission and judgment, within a period of 4 months, uninfluenced by the order(s) impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioners are found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to them and shall contain reasons, whereupon they shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 26.03.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.27 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.