2025:JHHC:11967 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2462 of 2025 Ajay Das, S/o Sundar Das, R/o village Paparwatand, PO: Giridih, PS: Giridih (M), Dist. Giridih. ….. Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party. ------- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, APP ----- 02/22.04.2025: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present anticipatory bail application under sections 482 and 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for the offences registered under sections 334(1), 303(2), 317(2) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in connection with Pachamba PS Case No.124 of 2024, corresponding to GR Case No. 499 of 2025. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client has received notice u/s 35(3) of BNSS and he has gone to the police station and got his statement recorded but he is not aware whether the police has recorded his statement or not. 4. The learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail 5. From the statement of the counsel for the petitioner it is quite clear that there is no threat of arrest of the petitioner. Thus, this anticipatory bail application is not maintainable at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable. (ANANDA SEN, J. ) KNR/