APHC010126032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6754/2025 Between: 1. KAKARLA RAJANI, W/O KAKARLA KISHORE, AGED 43 YRS , OCC- STREET VENDOR, R/AT 18-79-9 MAHARANIPETA VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. NAYANA SATYAVATHI, W/O NAYANA MALLESH, AGED 58 YRS, OCC- STREET VENDOR, D.N0.26-5-135/B , POORNA MARKET AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. BOJA RAVANAMMA, W/O SURIBABU, AGED 53 YRS, OCC- STREET VENDOR, D.NO.27-20-2, POORNA MARKET AREA VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. KINJARAPU PARVATHI, W/O KINJARAPU SIMAYYA, AGED 62 YRS , OCC- STREET VENDOR, PRASAD GARDENS, POORNA MARKET AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. CHILLA APPAYAMMA, W/O CHIIIA APPALA REDDY(LATE), AGED - MAJOR, D.NO.26-5-369, POORNA MARMET AREA ,VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. KUMIII APPALANARASAMMA, W/O KUMIII THULASERAO, AGED- 54 YRS, PRASAD GARDENS, POORNA MARKET AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MUNCIPAL ADMINISTRATION) 2 SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNCIPAL CORPORATION GVMC, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ASSILMETTA JUNCTION, TENNETIBHAVAN, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, (TRAFFIC), I TOWN POLICE STATION , OLD TOWN, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the State submitted that some of the street vendors have been identified in pursuance of the interim directions passed in W.P. (PIL) No. 81/2025, whereby the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court directed the respondents not to issue further licenses to street vendors anywhere in the State till there is a plan in place prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. 2. It is submitted that, in pursuance of the directions of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court, the respondent authorities have identified the places for granting permissions to the street vendors, and further action shall be taken subject to the outcome of W.P. (PIL) No. 81/2025. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that, after the filing of the writ petition, the petitioner was allotted an alternate earmarked space for conducting business. The respondents would have to comply with the further directions passed by this Court in W.P. (PIL) No. 81/2025. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 04.08.2025 PNS 4