Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110074 (ALL)

VIJAY KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/42061/2024 · 2025-08-04

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131409 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 42061 of 2024 Applicant :- Vijay Kumar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Shukla,R.B. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar,Sharda Babu Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.794 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 279 of 2023, under sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Phulpur, District Prayagraj, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate-4, Allahabad. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have amicably settled their dispute out of court and entered into a compromise and compromise application dated 15.04.2025 has been filed before the Judicial Magistrate IVth Allahabad. In paragraph-8 of the counter affidavit, it has been specifically stated that dispute between the parties has been settled, compromise has been done and in terms of the said compromise, proceedings be quashed. A copy of the compromise deed entered into between the parties has been annexed as Annexure-5 to the application. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the facts argued by learned counsel for the applicants. 5. Learned AGA submits that offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, are compoundable offence and court concerned has power to set-aside the proceedings as per the provision provided under Section 320 Cr.P.C. 6. Considered the submissions raised by learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire record. Since, offences under the aforesaid sections are compoundable offence and the compromise application is pending before the court concerned, the trial court is directed to decide the pending compromise application dated 15.04.2025 moved on behalf of both the parties, in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks with reasoned and speaking order after hearing both the parties. 7. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of. 8. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad