Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11007 (GAU)

PINKU BORAH v. RANJIT NATH AND 17 ORS

RSA/64/2025 · 2025-08-12

Robin Phukan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010082372025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/64/2025 PINKU BORAH S/O SRI NOBIN BORA, R/O BOR ALEGI SATRA, P.O. ISLAM GAON, P.S. BIHPURIA, DIST. LAKHIMPUR. VERSUS RANJIT NATH AND 17 ORS S/O LT. GOPAL CHANDRA NATH, R/O WARD NO 3, BIHPURIA TOWN, P.O. AND P.S. BIHPURIA 784161, DIST. LAKHIMPUR. 2:HARENDRA NATH BORA S/O MALIRAM BORA 3:ASHOK CHAKRABORTY S/O KAMAKKHYA CHAKRABORTY 4:SMT. SAPNA CHAKRABORTY D/O KAMAKHYA CHAKRABORTY 5:UTPAL CHAKRABORTY S/O KAMAKHYA CHAKRABORTY 6:RAHUL CHAKRABORTY S/O KAMAKHYA CHAKRABORTY) 7:ANIL KUMAR SINGH S/O LALAL SINGH 8:SMT. PHULPHULI GUPTA Page No.# 2/3 DIST. LAKHIMPUR 9:AMRAWATI GUPTA DIST. LAKHIMPUR 10:SMT. CHANDA GUPTA SAHU DIST. LAKHIMPUR 11:SMTI. BRINDA GUPTA SAHU DIST. LAKHIMPUR 12:SMT. MIRA GUPUTA SAHU DIST. LAKHIMPUR 13:SMT. GITA GUPTA DIST. LAKHIMPUR 14:SMT. PUSPA DAS GUPTA DIST. LAKHIMPUR 15:SMT. ASHA SAHU GUPTA DIST. LAKHIMPUR 16:SMT. USHA SAHU GUPTA DIST. LAKHIMPUR 17:SMT. PUJA GUPTA (ALL D/O SIBA DAS GUPTA R/O BIHPURIA TOWN WARD NO 3 P.O. AND P.S. BIHPURIA PIN 784161 DIST. LAKHIMPUR) 18:UNITED BANK OF INDIA PRESENTLY RENAMED AT PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS BANK MANAGER BIHPURIA TINI ALI BRANCH P.O. AND P.S. BIHPURIA 784161 DIST. LAKHIMPU Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S G BARUAH, MR. B BORGOHAIN,MR B SAIKIA,MR. S NEOG Advocate for the Respondent : MR N N UPADHYAYA, FOR CAVEATOR,B B KAKATI,MR. D K Page No.# 3/3 BAGCHI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER Date : 13.08.2025 Heard Mr. B. Saikia, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. D.K. Bagchi, learned counsel for the respondents. Mr. Saikia, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has instruction to withdraw this appeal and that liberty may be granted to avail other legal remedies. In view of such statement, this second appeal stands disposed of on withdrawal. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to avail other legal remedies. JUDGE Comparing Assistant