Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 110047 (ALL)

SMT VANDANA VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/19791/2024 · 2025-02-16

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22008 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19791 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Vandana Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- Ankit Saran,C.S.C.,Parijat Kumar Tiwari,Venu Gopal Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. The petitioner has challenged his suspension order dated 20.11.2024 and its contents are quoted below :- " ककरकरलर - मननहर भभषण इणटर ककललज, बरललल। पतकतकक ननलमबन / 77-81/2024-25 नदनकतक: 20 नवमबर, 2024 शलमतल वनदनक वमकर, स०अ० अतगलजल, मननहर भभषण इणटर ककललज, बरललल ननलमबन पत जजलक नवदकलर ननरलकक, बरललल कल पतकतकक मक०सदर / 8175- 76/2024-25 नदनकतक 11.11.2024 एवत पतकतकक मक०सदर / 8208- 09 / 2024-25 नदनकतक 12.11.2024 मम दनषल पकरल जकनल कल ककरण आपकल नवरद अननशकसनकतमक ककररवकहल नकरल जकनल कल ननदरश नदरल गरल हह। जजलक नवदकलर ननरलकक, बरललल कल उक ननदरशश कल अननपकलन मम तथक पबतध सनमनत दकरक गनठत जकजच सनमनत दकरक पसतनत जकजच आखरक नदनकतक 13.11.2024 कल आधकर पर आपकन ततककल पभकव सल ननलममबत नकरक जकतक हह। ननलमबन अवजध मम ननरमकननसकर ननलमबन भतक दलर हनगक । ( अननल कन मकर) पबनधक मननहर भभषण इणटर ककललज, बरललल" 2. Sri Ashish Dwivedi, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has not granted any opportunity to confront the outcome of inquiry committee as well as according to his instructions, even after 3 months, no charge sheet has been handed over to him as well as approval of suspension order is being granted by D.I.O.S. concerned after filing of this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel further submits that in impugned suspension order, no reason has been assigned. 4. Sri Sandeep, learned counsel for respondents submits that no charge sheet has been handed over to petitioner till date. 5. In aforesaid circumstances, Court takes note of submission of learned counsel for petitioner that firstly, impugned suspension order has not assigned any reason. Even no allegation is mentioned in said order as well as secondly, no charge sheet has been handed over to petitioner, however, since now D.I.O.S. has approved suspension order which is not under challenge, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in case no charge sheet is provided to petitioner within 2 weeks from today and after reply inquiry is not concluded within 3 weeks thereafter, impugned suspension order will be considered to be kept in abeyance. 6. 6. The Management will forward the papers for subsistence allowance, if already not forwarded to D.I.O.S. concerned within a week, on which, the D.I.O.S. will undertake subsequent steps for payment, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Sinha_N. Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad