CRM-M No.651 IN THE 252 Ankit Kumar State of Haryana CORAM : HON Present: Mr. for t Mr. *** MANJARI NEH 1. The the Bharatiya N under Sections registered at Poli 2. Lear been in custody s false version has reproduced in the along with some these persons in respective weapo been asserted by inflicted repeated would not have o.65189 of 2024 -1- THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM-M N Date of De Versus ryana HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJ Mr. Manvinder Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryan *** I NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking the concess iya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in cas tions 506, 452, 323, 148, 149 IPC (S at Police Station Chhapar, District Yam Learned counsel for the petitioner stody since 16.08.2024 in an evident c on has been brought forth in the FI in the body of the petition that the pe some other persons, who were armed ons including the petitioner attacke weapons, as a result of which, he sus ted by the learned counsel for the p epeated blows with a danda on the have escaped with simple injuries NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH M No.65189 of 2024 e of Decision:13.01.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondent MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Haryana. oncession of bail under Section 483 of in case FIR No.38 dated 15.02.2024 PC (Section 308 IPC added later on) ct Yamuna Nagar. tioner contends that the petitioner has dent case of false implication. Totally the FIR in question, which has been the petitioner was armed with a danda armed with kirpans and fire arms; al attacked the complainant with their he sustained multiple injuries. It has the petitioner that had the petitioner n the person of the complainant, he uries rather he would have sustained 483 of 2.2024 ter on) er has Totally en anda ms; all their It has titioner ant, he stained PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.14 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRM-M No.651 much more serio legal report. It h is complete in th possibility of the cited by the pro submitted that co Dhiman, who w enlarged on bail b 3. Per submissions mad against all accuse reproduced herei “Th that Poli Gur Chh prod follo that Dar Dhi com and stick o.65189 of 2024 -2- e serious injuries than the ones, whic t. It has also been submitted by the le e in the present case, as challan stands of the trial concluding in the near fut he prosecution have been examined that co-accused namely Sanjeev Kum ho were also named in the FIR i n bail by this Court. Per contra, learned State counsel s made by the counsel opposite, has accused including the petitioner in th herein under:- The detail of application is as fol that at the same time I/SI Surender Police station that at the same Gurjeet Singh, resident of Kheri Chhapar District Yamuna Nagar ca produced a local application 110 follows:- To SHO, Police Station C that I Kamal Randhawa son of Gur Darshan Singh. Sir, I have a cloth Dhiman and Ankit Rana, Harman re companions came to my shop, after and now in Sabalpur, they surrou sticks, rods and kirpans and they , which find reflected in his medico the learned counsel that investigation stands presented, however, there is no ear future, as none of the 27 witnesses mined till date. It has further been v Kumar @ Chota, Harman and Lali FIR in question, have already been unsel while opposing the prayer and has reiterated the allegations levelled r in the FIR in question, which stands follow; at this time it is registered der Singh No.302/A am/is present a me time Kamal Randhawa son o eri Darshan Singh, Police Station r came present in police station and 110 dated 12.02.2024, which is as n Chhapar YNR. Sir, it is requested Gurjeet Singh am resident of Kher loth shop in Mustafabad, today Lali an residents of Namdarpur and their afterward they went away from there rrounded us and attacked us with hey also had pistols and Gatta and edico- igation e is no tnesses r been d Lalit been er and led stands tered nt at n of ation and is as ested heri Lalit their there with and PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.14 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRM-M No.651 they num inju actio 4. How instructions that was alleged to b disputed by the le 5. I hav placed on record. 6. The and circumstance concluding in the petitioner to bail. 7. Acc admitted to bail o Court/Duty Mag observed hereina the merits of the 8. Nee granted to him, th January 13, 202 Pankaj* o.65189 of 2024 -3- they came in cars i-20 whose numb number is not known in which, I and injuries, now we are going to hospi action against them.” However, it has not been disputed s that the complainant had sustained s d to be armed with a danda. The sta y the learned State counsel. I have heard learned counsel for the record. The petitioner has been in custody stances as enumerated hereinabove, in the near future looks remote, this o bail. Accordingly, the instant petition bail on his furnishing bail/surety bon Magistrate concerned. However, i ereinabove shall not be construed to of the case. Needless to add, in case the petitione him, the State would be at liberty to se , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable umber is not known and i-10 whose I and Mandeep have received a lot o ospital. We request you to take lega puted by the learned State counsel on ined simple injuries and the petitioner he stage of the trial has also not been for the parties and perused the materia ustody since 16.08.2024. In the facts bove, since the possibility of the trial , this Court deems it fit to admit the tition is allowed. The petitioner be ty bonds to the satisfaction of the Tria ver, it is made clear that anything ed to be an expression of opinion on etitioner misuses the concession of bai y to seek cancellation of the same. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No hose lot of legal sel on titioner t been aterial facts e trial mit the ner be e Trial ything ion on of bail AUL) PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.14 13:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh