- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2681 RP No. 200017 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.200017 OF 2025 IN RPFC NO.200064/2023 BETWEEN: HULIRAJ S/O RAMIREDDY, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: JR. ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) GESCOM, R/O YARAGERA AD, ALSO AT H. NO. 1244/395, IDSMT, LAYOUT, RAICHUR-584101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI B. K. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KUM. SHWETARANI H. D/O HULIRAJ T, AGE: 24 YEARS OCC: STUDENT, R/O H. NO. 13-166-14-B, ANJALI NAGAR, NEAR PRATIBHA VIKASH, SCHOOL, GUNTAKAL, DIST. ANANTAPUR-515801. 2. MISS. GEETIKARANI D/O HULIRAJ T, AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT R/O H NO 13-166-14-B, ANJALI NAGAR, NEAR PRATIBHA VIKASH SCHOOL, GUNTAKAL DIST. ANANTAPUR-515801. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by NIJAMUDDIN JAMKHANDI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2681 RP No. 200017 of 2025 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN RPFC NO.200064/2023 DATED 04.01.2024 AND CONFIRM THE MAINTENANCE AMOUNT GRANTED BY PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT RAICHUR IN CRL. MISC. NO.188/2020 DATED 19.10.2022. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH) Office objections are over-ruled. 2. In this review petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 04.01.2024 passed in RPFC No.200064/2023. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, against the impugned order at Annexure-A, Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s).60126/2024 was filed and the Hon’ble Supreme Court reserved liberty to the review petitioner for modification of the amount of maintenance. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2681 RP No. 200017 of 2025 4. Having taken note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner and as the parties are residing separately and that apart, petitioner herein is working as a Junior Engineer (Electrical) GESCOM and respondent No.1 is being unmarried daughter of the review petitioner herein, I am of the view that no interference is called for in this review petition. In that view of the matter, there is no error apparent on the face of the record in the impugned order passed at Annexure-A. Accordingly, review petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SRT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1 CT:SI