Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84845 Court No. - 47 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44707 of 2024 Applicant :- Harish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Giriraj Pandey,Shravan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Learned A.G.A. informs that notice has been served upon the informant but no one has turned up to oppose this bail application. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State. There are allegations against the applicant of abduction of minor girl with intent to marry, commission of offence of rape, criminal intimidation and offence under section 4(2) POCSO Act .
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that victim has falsely implicated the applicant .She knew the applicant and other co-accused well.In her Majeed Bayan, she stated that she knew the mobile numbers of the all the accused.Before commission of alleged offences she talked with them and went to them.Victim has falsely implicated the applicant .As per her medical report no sign of commission of offence of rape has been found.The applicant is in jail since 26.6.2024 and has no criminal history to his credit. On the other hand learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused,
submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above, finding force in the
submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, larger mandate of the Article 21
of the Constitution of India, recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 LawSuit (SC) 677. and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant,Harish , involved in Case Crime No.133 of 2020 , under Section- 363,366,376D(a),328,504,506 IPC, section 4(2) POCSO Act and section 3(2)(v),3(1)(r)(s) of SC/St Act Police Station- Aonla, District- Bareilly, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses. (ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82
Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 20.5.2025 Atul kr. sri. Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad