Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109937 (ALL)

SATYENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/42272/2024 · 2025-01-20

Dinesh Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10010 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 42272 of 2024 Applicant :- Satyendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Prasad Shukla,Niranjan Lal Agrawal,Shobhit Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records. 2. The applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the Non-bailable warrant (NBW) dated 13.11.2024 issued by the A.D.&S.J./S.J., Bareilly, charge order dated 12.06.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.2, Bareilly, in S.T. No.238 of 2015 and charge-sheet dated 23.01.2015 filed in connection with Case Crime No.59 of 2015, under Sections 401 and 398 of IPC, Police Station- Baradari, District- Bareilly, pending before the A.D.&S.J./S.J., Bareilly. 3. After due deliberation at length, learned counsel for the applicant has chosen not to press the instant application on merits, however, he has submitted that the applicant is ready and willing to cooperate with the court below and participate in the court proceedings provided some interim protection may be granted to him. It is next submitted that the present applicant has never intended to ignore the court proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if protection is granted to the present applicant to enable him to appear before the court below. 5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep the instant application pending and the same is being decided without entering into the merits of the case with a direction that in case the present applicant appears/surrenders and moves bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned having considered the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks, thereafter. 6. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicant in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Rama Kant Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad