Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109935 (MAD)

HARI v. State rep by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/27480/2025 · 2025-10-08

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.OP.No.27480 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.27480 of 2025 Hari ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai District. ... Respondent (Cr.No.603 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.603 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police pending on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.09.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 309(4), 311, 324(4) and 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.603 of 2025 on the file 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.27480 of 2025 of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.400/- from him at knife point. The petitioner has also abused and assaulted the defacto complainant and also criminally intimidated him. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in prison from 08.09.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the petitioner is having seven previous cases and he is also a History Sheeter vide H.S.No.12 of 2012. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.27480 of 2025 6. Considering the fact that the investigation is also pending and the petitioner is having seven previous cases and he is also a history sheeter. Further, if the released on bail, he shall commit the same offence repeatedly, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 08.10.2025 Vv To 1. The Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram 2. The Inspector of Police, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR , J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.27480 of 2025 Vv Crl.O.P.No.27480 of 2025 08.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis