JAGSEER SINGH ALIAS JAGGA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/64914/2024 · 2025-04-08
Manjari Nehru Kaul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 109922 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 109922 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
281.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
Jagseer Singh @ Jagga
State of Punjab and others
CORAM:
Present:
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
1.
dated 13.09.2024, under Section 406 of IPC Chhajali, District Sangrur proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise 04.11.2024
2.
directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM
Date Jagseer Singh @ Jagga
Versus
State of Punjab and others
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab Mr. Sahilpreet Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition dated 13.09.2024, under Section 406 of IPC Chhajali, District Sangrur (Annexure P proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise .2024 (Annexure P-2) arrived at, between the parties. Vide order dated 20.12.2024
directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64914-2024 of decision: 08.04.2025
.... Petitioner
.... Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Advocate for the petitioner. eep Singh, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1. Sahilpreet Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. is for quashing of FIR No.85, dated 13.09.2024, under Section 406 of IPC, registered at Police Station (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated between the parties. of this Court, the parties were
directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between FIR No.85, , registered at Police Station consequential dated , the parties were
directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.08 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-64914-2024
- 2 -
3.
Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sunam, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein, the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will and the complainant/respondents No.2 and 3 have also made statements to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioner is quashed.
4.
The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, alongwith its report.
5.
In compliance of order dated 20.12.2024, status report by way of an affidavit dated 05.04.2025 of Prithvi Singh, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Dirba, on behalf of respondent No.1-State, has been filed in Court today, which is taken on record.
6.
Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioner and respondents No.2 and 3 are the only aggrieved persons in the FIR in question.
7.
In view of the report of learned trial Court and the principles laid down by Hon’ble the Apex Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed qua petitioner.
SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.08 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-64914-2024
- 3 -
8.
Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below.
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)
JUDGE April 08, 2025 sanjeev
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No
SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.08 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document