Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109891 (ALL)

PRADEEP KUMAR MAURYA v. State of UP AND 14 OTHERS

WRIB/4604/2024 · 2025-05-15

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80931 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4604 of 2024 Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of Up And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Mr. Dhirendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.C. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Mau, District- Mau (Respondent no.2) to ensure the hearing of Appeal No.1583/ 1822 of 2023, Computerized Case No.C202354155100002188, Harindra Nath vs. Purnavasi and others, under Section 11(1) of U.P.C.H. Act against the order dated 2.8.2021 passed in Case No.153 and decided the same expeditiously within prescribed time which this Hon'ble Court may fixed." 3. This Court directed the learned Standing Counsel for the State to obtain instruction in the matter. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the pending title appeal filed by respondent no.3 has been decided by Settlement Officer of Consolidation during pendency of the instant petition, as such, no further cause of action survives in the matter. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Rameez Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad