[2025:RJ-JP:37035] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6676/2002 Gyanendra Kumar Saxena S/of Shri Vijay Narayan Saxena Aged about 46 years, R/of H.no. Ta-1, RHB Colony, Sakatpura, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Deptt. of Land Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Kota Division, Kota. 3. Distt. Collector, (Land Record), Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 11/09/2025 1. Perusal of the record reveals that when the matter was listed on 18.02.2008, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- "Put up after four weeks." 2. Again, when the matter was listed on 19.03.2008, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- "On 18.02.2008, none appeared for the petitioner and today also. This Court considers it proper to grant one more opportunity. List on 08.04.2008." 3. Again, when the matter was listed on 09.07.2008, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- [2025:RJ-JP:37035] (2 of 2) [CW-6676/2002] "No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. On perusal of the petition, it transpires that the matter requires consideration. Hence, the petition is admitted. Fresh notices need not be issued to the respondents as they have already been represented by the learned Deputy Government Counsel. Put up for hearing in due course." 4. Again, when the matter was listed on 10.09.2025, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- "No one has put in appearance on behalf of both the parties even in the second round. In the interest of justice, one last opportunity is granted to learned counsel for both the parties to make their submissions. List the matter tomorrow i.e. 11.09.2025." 5. Today also nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner, even in the second round. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 7. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the writ petition, if the cause of action still survives. 8. Other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /11