Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109844 (ALL)

BHEEKAM SINGH ALIAS BHUKHRAM v. State of UP AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/40328/2024 · 2025-05-13

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79146 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40328 of 2024 Petitioner :- Bheekam Singh Alias Bhukhram Respondent :- State Of Up And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Babu Lal Ram,Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed for the following relief : "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to hand over the possession of the petitioner over the Gata No. 547/269 area 0.146 Hectare, Gata No. 258 area 0.384 Hectare situated in Village Churthara Block Awagarh Tehsil Jalesar District Etah and also completing boundary/med of the petitioner in the abovementioned land. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to decide and consider the representation dated 23.11.2024 of the petitioner in respect of providing possession as well as with regard to completing medbandi (boundary line) over the Gata No. 547/269 area 0.146 Hectare, Gata No. 258 area 0.384 Hectare situated in Village Churthara Block Awagarh Tehsil Jalesar District Etah.." 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that an order under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was passed. Thereafter, boundary marks were installed after demarcation. The private respondents have demolished the the boundary marks installed. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioner can move an application under Section 22/23 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 5. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 6. The present petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move an application under Section 22/23 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In case such an application is moved by the petitioner within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided next twelve weeks after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 14.5.2025/S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad