Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10984 (PNJ)

VIRENDER SINGH v. VINEET GARG, IFS AND ANR

COCP/53/2025 · 2025-09-01

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-53-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 216 Virender Singh Vineet Garg and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. compliance of order dated co-ordinate vs. State of Haryana and others were dispo 2152-2020, t others’ whereby the res 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Virender Singh Versus Vineet Garg and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been compliance of order dated 20.03.2024 ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-20149 State of Haryana and others’ and other connected petition(s) which were disposed of in terms of order dated 2020, titled as ‘Ashish Sharma and others whereby the respondents have been directed as under: “43. In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of in the terms and conditions mentioned herein before. Let the respondent-State pass appropriate speaking order as directed herein before. In case, any of the petitioner is found entitled for regularization/retrospective regularization of services from the date employees junior to him/her has been regularized, they will be granted the said date of regularization otherwise due reasons be mentioned in the speaking order keeping in mind the directions give Court herein before so as to decide the eligibility of each IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-53-2025 Date of Decision: 01.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA rashar, AAG, Haryana. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non- (Annexure P-1) passed by a 20149-2016, titled as ‘Virender and other connected petition(s) which in terms of order dated 13.03.2024 passed in CWP- Ashish Sharma and others vs. State of Haryana and have been directed as under:- In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of in the terms and conditions mentioned herein before. Let the State pass appropriate speaking order as directed herein before. In case, any of the petitioner is found ation/retrospective regularization of services from the date employees junior to him/her has been regularized, they will be granted the said date of regularization otherwise due reasons be mentioned in the speaking order keeping in mind the directions given by the Court herein before so as to decide the eligibility of each passed by a and other connected petition(s) which State of Haryana and In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of in the terms and conditions mentioned herein before. Let the State pass appropriate speaking order as directed herein before. In case, any of the petitioner is found ation/retrospective regularization of services from the date employees junior to him/her has been regularized, they will be granted the said date of regularization otherwise due reasons be mentioned in the n by the Court herein before so as to decide the eligibility of each RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.02 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-53-2025 2. appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 3. against the 2562-2024, filed by the respondents which was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.11.2024; against which SLP (Civil) bearing Diary No. 24369 Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order direct that Learned counsel for the contempt is made out against the respondents. 4. Supreme Court respondent 5. 2025 -2- petitioners qua their respective claims. Further in case any of the petitioners is found entitled for regularization of his services retrospectively the said benefit shall be given notionally, no arrears will be granted to the petitioners up to the date of filing of the respective petitions. The petitioners will be entitled for fixing of their salaries from the date of regularization notionally and the arrears will only be extended from the date of filing of their respective petitions before this Court and if any of the petitioners has already retired, his/her pensionary benefits will also be fixed/revised and arrears will also be extended from the date of filing the petition by the said petitioner. Even in the second round of hearing, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that against the aforesaid order dated 13.03.2024 2024, titled as ‘State of Haryana and others filed by the respondents which was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.11.2024; against which SLP (Civil) bearing Diary No. 24369-2025, has been filed by the respondents in which the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 29.05.2025 direct that ‘operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed earned counsel for the respondents submits that contempt is made out against the respondents. A copy of the order dated 29.05.2025, passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, handed over in Court by learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record. Heard. petitioners qua their respective claims. Further in case any of the petitioners is found entitled for regularization of his services retrospectively the said benefit shall be given ally, no arrears will be granted to the petitioners up to the date of filing of the respective petitions. The petitioners will be entitled for fixing of their salaries from the date of regularization notionally and the arrears will only be e date of filing of their respective petitions before this Court and if any of the petitioners has already retired, his/her pensionary benefits will also be fixed/revised and arrears will also be extended from the date of filing the titioner.” Even in the second round of hearing, none has put in by learned counsel for the respondents that 13.03.2024, an appeal bearing LPA- State of Haryana and others vs. Virender’, has been filed by the respondents which was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.11.2024; against which SLP (Civil) bearing 2025, has been filed by the respondents in which the 29.05.2025, has been pleased to ‘operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed’. submits that in view of the above, no contempt is made out against the respondents. 29.05.2025, passed by the Hon’ble , handed over in Court by learned counsel for the petitioners qua their respective claims. Further in case any of the petitioners is found entitled for regularization of his services retrospectively the said benefit shall be given ally, no arrears will be granted to the petitioners up to the date of filing of the respective petitions. The petitioners will be entitled for fixing of their salaries from the date of regularization notionally and the arrears will only be e date of filing of their respective petitions before this Court and if any of the petitioners has already retired, his/her pensionary benefits will also be fixed/revised and arrears will also be extended from the date of filing the Even in the second round of hearing, none has put in by learned counsel for the respondents that ’, has been filed by the respondents which was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.11.2024; against which SLP (Civil) bearing 2025, has been filed by the respondents in which the , has been pleased to ’. in view of the above, no 29.05.2025, passed by the Hon’ble , handed over in Court by learned counsel for the RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.02 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-53-2025 6. passed in the present petition 7. 8. 01.09.2025 rishu 2025 -3- In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable no further orders are required to be stands disposed of, accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No no further orders are required to be RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.02 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.