Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:7045 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 19299 of 2024 Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Saroj,Rahul Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Diptiman Singh,Prateek Rai Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Heard Sri Avinash Agarwal, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Prateek Rai, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and Sri Manoj Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for State. The petitioner's case is that he got 70 marks and cut off is 70 marks is based on system generated calculation in the form while submitting online. Learned counsel for respondents submits that few facts are not mentioned in writ petition that petitioner was provided 10 number of experience on basis of an order passed by this Court which has been set aside by the Supreme Court in a judgment dated 18.12.2024 passed in Allahabad University Etc. Vs. Geetanjali Tiwari (Pandey) and others, 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1212, therefore, at this stage, petitioner has much less marks than 70 marks i.e. the cut off. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has no knowledge or instruction about said judgments and prays that if a communication is made by University mentioning all such facts, he will be satisfied and if advised, he may take legal remedy, in accordance with law. Learned counsel for respondents submits that there is no provision to provide any such communication except on a proper application, still University will communicate the petitioner the reasons that he got less than 70 marks i.e. the cut off. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that University will provide the legal impediment and reasons to petitioner that he got less than 70 marks. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation. Order Date :- 16.1.2025 P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad