CRL OP NO. 31969 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-01-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP NO. 31969 of 2024 GANESAN, S/o. Karuppaiahdevar, No.46/1, Melatheru Street, Melur, Madurai District. Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By State represented by lnspector of Police, Peerkkankaranai Police Station, Chennai. (Cr.No.7S of 2024) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Yuva Raj For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate, (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner/A3, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 419, 464, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, in Crime No.75 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have impersonated the original owner Late L.Kanniappan and created fake documents and sold the properties to the other persons. Hence, the complaint was registered. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that A1, A2 and A4 have been granted bail. The petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner and other accused persons have impersonated the original owner late L.Kanniappan and grabbed the properties belonging to the defacto complainant. It bail is granted there is every possibility for tampering the witnesses and may abscond either during investigation or trial. Further, there is no change of circumstances. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.From the perusal of the records, it is seen that the petitioner and other accused persons have impersonated the original owner Late.L.Kanniappan and created fake documents and grabbed the properties belonging to the defacto complainant. Further, the Death Certificate of the said L.Kanniappan has been produced. Sofar, the documents have not been cancelled. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner has involved in a very serious offence and there is likelihood of the petitioner indulging in activities which https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis would be prejudicial for investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 23-01-2025 mps To 1. The State Rep By State represented by lnspector of Police, Peerkkankaranai Police Station, Chennai. (Cr.No.7S of 2024) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.V.THAMAILSELVI, J. mps CRL OP NO. 31969 of 2024 23-01-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis