CRM-M No.651 IN THE 241 Vikas State of Haryana CORAM : HON Present: Mr. Ms. for t Mr. *** MANJARI NEH 1. The the Bharatiya Na under Sections registered at Poli 2. Lear petitioner has be Annexure P-1, ho role, much less, a it is evidently a for the petitioner the complainant in any manner in learned counsel f been named in th o.65108 of 2024 -1- THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM-M N Date of De Versus ryana HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJ Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate Ms. Khushboo Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya, AAG, Haryan *** I NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking the concess iya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in case ions 110, 115, 190, 192(2) and 351(2) at Police Station Rampura, District Rew Learned counsel for the petition has been named in the FIR in questi 1, however, a perusal of the same, le less, any injury has been attributed to tly a case of false implication, as the itioner, in the absence of any previous ant party, to have accompanied the ner in the occurrence in question. It unsel for the petitioner that one of th d in the FIR in question but also attr NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH M No.65108 of 2024 e of Decision:10.01.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondent MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Haryana. oncession of bail under Section 483 of in case FIR No.239 dated 24.10.2024 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Rewari. etitioner submits that although the question, which has been annexed as me, leaves no manner of doubt that no ted to him. He has also submitted tha as there could have been no occasion vious history of strained relations with ed the co-accused or have participated on. It has still further been argued by of the co-accused, who had not only so attributed an injury with a stick on 483 of 0.2024 anhita h the xed as that no ed that casion s with cipated by ot only tick on PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.13 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRM-M No.651 the person of the a Coordinate Ben Therefore, in the admit the petition 3. Per submissions mad which stand repro “To Sach Rew uncl Bhu wer Ji li Shah Sing Vika boys four beh othe me toda Lega with 4. Lear other than being been attributed to was unarmed. It o.65108 of 2024 -2- of the complainant, has already been te Bench of this Court vide order da in the aforesaid facts and circumstan etitioner to bail. Per contra, learned State counsel s made by the counsel opposite, has re d reproduced herein under:- To the SHO Sahib, Police Statio Sachin S/o Azad Singh resident Rewari. Yesterday, on 23.10.2024 uncle's son Rajesh S/o Mukesh an Bhupendra S/o Roshanlal, resident were going from the temple to our Ji living in the temple of our village Shahjad and Dheeraj S/o Hawa Sin Singh resident of Gubalpura and w Vikas S/o Indrajeet and Manjeet res boys came with sticks and iron rods four of us, as soon as they arrive behind, Dheeraj, Dharmendra and other parts with the sticks and iron me and my companions and while today we have let you all go, next tim Legal action should be taken again without any reason.” Learned State counsel, on instructio being named in the FIR in question uted to the petitioner and furthermore, ed. It has also not been disputed tha been enlarged on anticipatory bail by der dated 22.11.2024 (Annexure P-3) mstances, a prayer has been made to unsel while opposing the prayer and has reiterated the contents of the FIR Station Rampura Rewari. Sir I am ent of village Gulabpura, Distric 024 at around 10:15 PM, I and my and Vikrant S/o Karna Singh and idents of Gulabpura, the four of us our homes after giving food to Baba llage. At the same time, Yashpal S/o Singh and Dharmendra S/o Hawas d with them Sohil S/o Ravindra and t resident of Dehlawas and 3-4 other rods in their hands and attacked al rrived, Yashpal caught Rajesh from and Sohil hit us on the head and iron rods in their hands and also hi hile leaving they were saying tha xt time we will kill one or two of you against the above boys who beat us tructions, has not disputed the fact tha estion, no role, much less, injury has rmore, at the relevant point of time, he ted that the co-accused, Sohil Kumar bail by 3). ade to er and e FIR, I am strict d my and of us Baba l S/o awas and other d all from and o hit that you. at us ct that ry has me, he umar, PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.13 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRM-M No.651 who has been a concession of in annexed as Anne 5. I hav placed on record. 6. The been attributed occurrence in q instructions, the fateful day. hereinabove, this petitioner. 7. Acc admitted to bail o Court/Duty Mag observed hereina the merits of the 8. Nee granted to him, th January 10, 202 Pankaj* o.65108 of 2024 -3- een attributed an injury with a stic of interim bail by this Court vide or Annexure P-3. I have heard learned counsel for the record. The petitioner has been in custody uted any role, much less, injury on in question. As not disputed by s, the petitioner was not carrying any y. Therefore, in the facts and e, this Court deems it fit to extend Accordingly, the instant petition bail on his furnishing bail/surety bon Magistrate concerned. However, i ereinabove shall not be construed to of the case. Needless to add, in case the petitione him, the State would be at liberty to se 0, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable a stick has since been extended the vide order dated 22.11.2024, which is for the parties and perused the materia ustody since 22.11.2024. He has no ury on the complainant party in the ed by the learned State counsel on ng any arm, much less, lethal on the and circumstances as enumerated extend the concession of bail to the tition is allowed. The petitioner be ty bonds to the satisfaction of the Tria ver, it is made clear that anything ed to be an expression of opinion on etitioner misuses the concession of bai y to seek cancellation of the same. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No ed the hich is aterial as not in the sel on on the erated to the ner be e Trial ything ion on of bail AUL) PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.13 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh