Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10976 (CHH)

MR. SURJIT ROY v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

WPC/1164/2019 · 2025-02-12

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7493 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1164 of 2019 1 - Mr. Surjit Roy S/o Shri Mr. Sunil Chandra Roy Aged About 40 Years R/o E/42 Subhashani Bhawan, Near Ram Mandir Rohinpuram, R.S.U., District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - District Magistrate Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Axis Bank Ltd. Raipur Branch Chawla Chambers, Opp. New Bus Stand, Pandri Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - M/s R.K. Constructions, Proprietor, Vikas Jain S/o Late R.K. Jain, Shop No. 311, 312, 3rd Floor Lalganga Shopping Mall, G.E. Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - J.M. Asset Reconstruction Financial Company Pvt. Ltd. 3rd Floor, B Wing, Subhashish It Park, Plot No. 68 E, Datapada Road, Opp. Tata Steel, Mumbai 66, Through Authorized Officer, Vivek Mehara, Aged About 40 Years, S/o Vijay Mehara. 5 - M/s City Engineers, And Builders, A Partnership Firm, Through Its Partner Yusuf Raza S/o Late Md. Ishaq, R/o 82 Anand Nagar, Shaheed Veernarayan Singh Ward No. 32, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Abhyudav Tripathi, Advocate holding the Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH 2 brief of Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Parth Shrivastava, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 12.02.2025 Heard. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive if the cause of action survives. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Permission is granted. 4. With the aforesaid liberty as prayed for, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha