CRM-M-1503-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 128 CRM-M-1503-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2025 Gagandeep Singh and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: Ms. Deepika Verma, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev K. Virk, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Manjot Kaur, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. **** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU , J. Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’) praying for quashing of FIR No. 47 dated 21.05.2024 (P-1), under Sections 323 and 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at Police Station Maloud, District Khanna, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 15.07.2024 (P-2), entered into between the parties i.e. petitioners as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2. Allegations are that petitioners in furtherance of their common intention inflicted injuries on the person of complainant party with their respective weapons. 3. This Court on 07.04.2025 passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioners seek one more opportunity for recording the statements of parties in Rajeev Purohit 2025.05.21 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-1503-2025 2 terms of the order dated 14.01.2025. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 raises no objection to the prayer made by petitioners. In view of the above, one more opportunity is granted to petitioners to record their statements in terms of the order dated 14.01.2025 subject to costs of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. 5,000/- each petitioner) to be deposited with Punjab and Haryana High Court Employees Welfare Association, Account No. 37167209613, IFSC Code: SBIN0050306, State Bank of India, High Court Branch, Chandigarh. Let needful be done on or before 30.04.2025 in terms of order dated 14.01.2025 and report be submitted to this Court on or before the next date of hearing. Posted for 20.05.2025. Be shown in the Urgent list. ” 4. It transpires that in compliance of the aforesaid order, petitioners did not deposit costs of Rs.10,000/-. 5. Consequently, there is no option, except to dismiss the petition “at this stage”. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. The above observations be not construed as an expression of opinion on merits of the case in any manner. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 20.05.2025 (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) Rajeev (rvs) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Rajeev Purohit 2025.05.21 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document