Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10974 (JHR)

DAYAMAY GORAIN ALIAS DAYAMAY GORAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3158/2025 · 2025-04-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:11930 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3158 of 2025 ------ Dayamay Gorain @ Dayamay Gorai, aged about 59 years, son of Late Aashutosh Gorain, resident of Pathuria, P.O. Sarkardih, P.S.- Govindpur, District-Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr.Advocate : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 308(3) and 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly being armed with deadly weapons attempted to murder the informant-Subrat Das and Latif Ansari. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that except injury on the right arm of the informant, all other injuries are simple in nature. It is next submitted that for the self-same occurrence, from the side of the petitioner Govindpur P.S. Case No.08 of 2025 was instituted. It is next submitted that the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.02.2025 as is evident from para-19 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or their family members during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/