Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10972 (UTT)

GAGAN CHANDRA MAJHEE v. UDAY RAJ SINGH

CLCON/300/2024 · 2025-02-11

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON No.300 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, B.H. for the State. 3. It is contended by learned State counsel that the order complained of whereby respondent-contemnor was directed to decide representation of the petitioner has now been complied vide order dated 30.09.2024. 4. In this view of the matter, that the order has now been complied with, the contempt petition is hereby closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.02.2025 SK