Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:50756 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47265 of 2024 Applicant :- Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Aman Kumar Rai,Ashok Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ramdeo Pathak Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Aman Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ramdeo Pathak, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 229 of 2024, under Sections 64(1), 333, 115(2), 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station Mehdawat, District Sant Kabir Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The instant FIR is a counter blast to a FIR No.177 of 2024 instituted by the applicant against the family members of the informant. The FIR is delayed by about 50 days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The victim and applicant had regular telephonic conversations with each other, as such, the family members have beaten up the applicant and the FIR has been instituted and the instant story has been cooked subsequently. 5. It has been further argued that there is no medical corroboration of the incident. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.09.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and taking into consideration the settled law of the Supreme Court passed in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors., 2022 INSC 690 and Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 INSC 595 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Sonu Kumar @ Sonu, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Priya (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad