Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10970 (UTT)

IKHTIYAR AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2051/2021 · 2025-04-22

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2865 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.2051 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. D.N. Sharma, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent Nos.1 to 3. 3. It is informed by the learned State Counsel that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted by the Police on 10.12.2021 against the respondent No.4-Dharmendra Kashyap under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of IPC and under Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it has become infructuous. 4. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 6. Pending application stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 22.04.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c 16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D84BD B0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.04.22 17:05:13 +05'30'