Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109698 (ALL)

POORAN PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/44498/2024 · 2025-02-07

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 5 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44498 of 2024 Applicant :- Pooran Pathak Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Kumar Gupta,Subhash Chandra Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Matter is taken up in the revised call. By means of this bail application the applicant has prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 123 of 2024 at Police Station Gadhiya Rangeen, District Shahjahanpur under Sections 306, 316, 323 I.P.C. The applicant is in jail since 04.04.2024. The bail application of the applicant was rejected by the learned trial court on 16.07.2024. The following arguments made by Shri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel and Shri Subhash Chandra Gupta, learned counsel on behalf of the applicant, which could not be satisfactorily refuted by Shri Suchit Tandon, learned AGA from the record, entitle the applicant for grant of bail: 1. The applicant is the husband of the deceased. 2. The applicant never tortured the deceased or demanded dowry. 3. The deceased had a traumatic first marriage and was often depressed with memories of the same. 4. On the fateful day, the deceased succumbed to depression took the extreme step of ending her life. She committed suicide by hanging. 5. The post mortem report opines that the cause of death is asphyxia due to antemortem hanging. 6. Injuries depicted in the post mortem report consistent with hanging are: (i). Nature of ligature mark. (ii). No abnormality was detected in the hyoid bone. 7. The applicant did not aid or abet the suicide. 8. The applicant does not have any criminal history apart from this case. 9. The applicant is not a flight risk. The applicant being a law abiding citizen has always cooperated with the investigation and undertakes to join the trial proceedings. There is no possibility of his influencing witnesses, tampering with the evidence or reoffending. In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Pooran Pathak be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below. The following conditions be imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence or influence any witness during the trial. (ii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. The learned trial court is directed to fix the sureties after due application of mind in light of the judgement passed by this Court in Arvind Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. (Application U/S 482 No.2613 of 2023). The learned trial court shall ensure that the right of bail of the applicant granted by this Court is not frustrated by arbitrary demands of sureties, or onerous conditions which are unrelated to the socioeconomic status of the applicant. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad