Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10966 (CAL)

NIRMAL ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

AST/23/2017 · 2025-04-22

Ajay Kumar Gupta, Rajasekhar Mantha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

28.04.2025 Court No.13 Item No.5 sp AST 23 of 2017 Nirmal Roy Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Surajit Basu, Ms. Jasika Alam …for the appellant. Mr. Ashim Kr. Ganguly, ld. ASG Mr. Bellal Sk. …State. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submits that they have no objection to the withdrawal of Rs.5,00,000/- deposited with the SDO, Cooch Behar. 2. Counsel for the appellant submits that no formal claim of proceedings have been taken out against his client for any breach of condition of the rally in question. 3. In that view of the matter, let the SDO, Cooch Behar return a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the appellant within a period of one month from the date of communication of a copy of this order. 4. Since the appeal has become infructuous, AST 23 of 2017 shall stand disposed of. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) 2