COCP No.5254 of 202 IN TH 203-U DEEPAK VERM Vs KRISHAN KUM CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. for th Mr. A HARKESH MAN 1. Lear payment has been 2. Lear payment by the pe 3. Dism 4. Rule February 03, 202 Atik Whe Whe 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De VERMA AND ORS ...... KUMAR, IAS AND ORS ....Re ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Randhir Singh Manhas, Advocat for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel representin s been released in favour of the petitio Learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner and does not press the p Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. (HA 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.5254 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 03.02.2025 ......Petitioners ....Respondents ESH MANUJA dvocate senting the respondents submits th petitioners. ioners admits that factum of receipt o s the present petition. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 its that ceipt of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.04 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment