Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109630 (ALL)

SHAHNAZ PRAVEEN v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/40136/2024 · 2025-02-26

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:27683-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40136 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shahnaz Praveen Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajneesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 & 4. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated June 16, 2023 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3/Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division - IInd, Amroha is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad