Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109596 (PNJ)

DAVINDER SINGH KHERA AND ORS v. AJOY KUMAR SINHA IAS AND ORS

COCP/5250/2024 · 2025-04-02

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

170/7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DAVINDER SINGH KHERA AJOY KUMAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab HARKESH MANUJA, Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be rele under orders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits in terms of notifi In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertak salary of respondent Nos.1 and 2 is made. Rule discharged. Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is not complied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court imposing cost(s) of Rs.5,000/ automatically stand revived. 02.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: DAVINDER SINGH KHERA AND ORS Versus AJOY KUMAR SINHA IAS AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Parvesh K. Saini, Advocate with Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be rele under orders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits in terms of notification dated 05.07.2021 within the afore In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertak respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall remain attached till the compliance Rule discharged. Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is plied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court imposing cost(s) of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to each of the petitioners shall automatically stand revived. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA T CHANDIGARH COCP- 5250-2024 Date of Decision: April 02, 2025 .......Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA with Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be released their benefits under orders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra-Court appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits cation dated 05.07.2021 within the afore-stated period. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the shall remain attached till the compliance Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is plied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court to be paid to each of the petitioners shall (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2024 April 02, 2025 Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the ased their benefits Court appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the ing, the shall remain attached till the compliance Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is plied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court to be paid to each of the petitioners shall TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.04 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document