Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 109595 (MAD)

M.NAGAVEL v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/720/2025 · 2025-01-10

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.720 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.No.720 of 2025 M.Nagavel ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Ranipet – 632 401. 2.The Thasildhar, Nemili Taluk office, Ranipet – 631051. 3.The Block Development Officer, Kaveripakkam Union Panchayat, Kaveripakkam and Post, Arrakonam Ranipet – 604001. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to forthwith 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.720 of 2025 consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.11.2024 within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Venkateswaran For R1 and R2 : Mr.V.Ramesh Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.N.Muthuvel Government Advocate O R D E R By consent of both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as respondents, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2. The petitioner herein seeks a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 22.11.2024 within the time stipulated by this Court. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.720 of 2025 3. According to the petitioner, his father obtained a loan from the 3rd respondent for the purpose of digging a Well in his property by mortgaging the property covered by S.Nos.258 and 274/1 and 2 in Ayarpadi Village. The petitioner's father died in the year 1999. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 22.11.2024 expressing his willingness to repay the loan and get the mortgaged property redeemed and the said representation has not been considered by the respondents. Hence, the petitioner has come before this Court. 4. Mr.V.Ramesh, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.N.Muthuvel, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 3rd respondent. 5. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the 3rd respondent would submit that the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 22.11.2024 will be considered by the 3rd respondent in accordance with law, within the time stipulated by this Court. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.720 of 2025 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner and without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.11.2024 and pass final orders on its own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 10.01.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No dm 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.720 of 2025 To 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Ranipet – 632 401. 2.The Thasildhar, Nemili Taluk office, Ranipet – 631051. 3.The Block Development Officer, Kaveripakkam Union Panchayat, Kaveripakkam and Post, Arrakonam Ranipet – 604001. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.720 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. dm W.P.No.720 of 2025 10.01.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis