CR No.131 of 2025 (O IN TH 236-U CHHAJU RAM Vs STATE OF PUN CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. for th Mr. G HARKESH MAN [1]. By w of India, prayer h Court to decide t Ram (deceased) t [2]. Adm notification dated Land Acquisition award dated 12.0 petitioner was gra dissatisfied, the Act, which was de [3]. Aggr this Court, which compensation to (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CR No.131 Date of De RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH HI Vs PUNJAB AND ORS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Amitoj Singh Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punj **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed und ayer has been made for issuance of d cide the Execution No.1232/2019 da ed) through LRs vs. State of Punjab Admittedly, certain land owned by th dated 20.11.2006 and 29.04.2007 issu isition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the 1894 A 12.04.2008 passed by the Land Ac granted compensation to the tune , the petitioner (land owner) filed petit was decided by the Reference Court v Aggrieved thereof, the petitioner(s) which was disposed of vide order on to the tune of Rs.21 lakh per a UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 131 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 14.01.2025 H HIS LRs ......Petitioner(s) ....Respondent(s) ESH MANUJA ., Punjab. d under Article 227 of the Constitutio e of direction to the learned Executin dated 09.12.2019 titled as ‘Chha jab’ within a time bound period. d by the petitioner(s) was acquired vid issued under Sections 4 and 6 of th 1894 Act’) respectively, followed by a nd Acquisition Collector, whereby th e tune of Rs.10 lakhs per acre. Feelin d petition under Section 18 of the 189 ourt vide award dated 15.12.2010. (s) filed Regular First Appeal befo order dated 27.01.2016 enhancing th per acre. Later the petitioner(s) file 1 stitution ecuting hhaju red vide 6 of the d by an reby the Feeling he 1894 l before ing the filed MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.17 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR No.131 of 2025 (O Execution Petitio & Sessions Judge the enhanced amo [4]. Lear being aggrieved present revision p to decide the exec [5]. I hav book. [6]. A pe filed by the peti waiting to get the passed by this Co [7]. In as (2021) 6 SCC 4 proc exten [8]. In vi Sangrur (the Exe No.1232/2019 as months from toda rights of the petiti [9]. It is m expression of opin (O&M) Petition No.1232/2019 on 09.12.2019 Judge, Sangrur and the same is now d amount of compensation has not bee Learned counsel for the petitioner ieved of the non-disbursal of amount ision petition for issuance of direction e execution application expeditiously, I have heard learned counsel for th A perusal of record shows that exec etitioners on 09.12.2019 is still et their amount of compensation on th this Court. In Rahul S. Shah vs. Jinendra Ku CC 418 the Hon’ble Supreme Court “That the executing Cour proceedings within 6 months from extended only by recording reasons i In view of above, the Court of Ad e Executing Court) is requested to d as expeditiously as possible, prefe m today, as any further delay is going e petitioner(s). It is made clear that nothing said here of opinion on the merits of the executi .2019 before the learned Addl. Distri now fixed for 11.04.2025 and till dat not been disbursed to the petitioner(s) tioner(s) submits that the petitioner mount of compensation have filed th ection to the Executing Court concerne ously, in a time bound manner. for the parties and perused the pap t execution application (Annexure P still pending and the petitioner(s) n on the basis of order dated 27.01.201 Kumar Gandhi and others reporte Court held as follows:- Court must dispose of executio rom the date of filing which may b ons in writing for such delay.” of Addl. District and Sessions Judg d to dispose of the Executing Petitio , preferably within a period of next 0 going to cause serious prejudice to th id hereinabove shall be construed as an xecution proceedings. 2 District till date, (s). tioner(s) iled the ncerned e paper ure P-2) (s) is 01.2016 reported cution ay be Judge, Petition next 04 e to the d as an MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.17 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR No.131 of 2025 (O [10]. Petit application(s), if a January 14, 202 Atik Whe Whe (O&M) Petition stands disposed of in (s), if any shall also disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N f in the aforesaid terms. Pendin (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 3 Pending MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.17 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment