Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10957 (RAJ)

PHOOL SINGH v. BOARD OF REVENUE AJMER AND ORS

CW/5921/2002 · 2025-02-12

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5921/2002 Phool Singh (since deceased) through his legal heirs:- 1/1. Kuldeep Singh S/o Late Phool Singh 1/2. Samandar Singh W/o Late Phool Singh Both residents of village and post Iklera, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur 1/3. Inderwati D/o Late Shri Phool Singh wife of Shri Devendra Singh, resident of Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur ----Petitioners Versus 1. Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer 2. Revenue Appellate Authority, Bharatpur 3. Assistant Collector, Deeg, District Bharatpur 4. Dataram son of Shri Devi Sahai (since deceased) through his legal heirs 4/1 Kalawati widow of Late Shri Devi Sahai 4/2 Govind son of Late Shri Data Ram (Deceased) Both residents of village Dhamari, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur 4/3. Dropadi d/o late Shri Data Ram, resident of village Dabhara, Tehsil Chhata, District Mathura 4/4 Bimla d/o Late Shri Data Ram, resident of village Dabhara, Teshil Chhata, District Mathura (U.P.) 4/5 Dhakko D/o late Shri Data Ram, resident of village Kahrika, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Arvind Pareek Ms. Sakshi Tiwari Mr. Siddharth Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.C. Jain assisted by Ms. Kriti Jain Mr. Satyapal Poshwal assisted by Ms. Abhilasha Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order [2025:RJ-JP:6224] (2 of 2) [CW-5921/2002] 12/02/2025 This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- 1. The judgment and decree dated 18.03.2002 passed by the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer (for brevity “the BoR”) in Appeal No.201/1996: Phool Singh versus Dataram & Ors. are quashed and set aside. 2. The aforesaid appeal is restored to its original number. 3. The BoR shall decide the aforesaid appeal afresh after taking into consideration the application filed by the petitioner/appellant under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 CPC. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/1